Just as it says, Lady Lostris. You say I've done wrong but yet none of you have acknowledged that what the Anon has been doing is wrong. You guys can't justify punishing only me in this case, because I'm not the only one who did wrong, that Anon's been a jerk a lot lately, I was merely trying to discourage his attitude and his commenting style. It had nothing to do with my hate for the new series, I was trying to get him to stop annoying the wiki with him imposing his views on the rest of us. You guys don't think he did wrong but I'm telling you, he did. He is actively doing it. You guys hate me, that much I can see. But you can't use that as your excuse to punish only me and not him. You don't think he's doing wrong now but trust me, he will if you keep letting him off the hook. Are you sure you guys weren't partially motivated by bias in blocking me again? I get it, you folks hate me and my commenting style. But you think I'm stupid enough to evict a user myself when I don't have that authority? I was giving him something to think about in his actions. He is not clear of guilt in this and you folks know it. If you're going to do it to me, do it to him. Maybe we're both guilty, and you can't use your dislike of me to ignore what he's doing. Granted, I'm mostly referring to PSUAvatar14 as he's the one who administered the block, but you're also an admin and I see you think I am the only one guilty here. You folks aren't giving me a chance to explain myself so I'm forced to come to you to tell you what the real story was.
FE, I will respond to you one time only out of cutesy for you taking the trouble of writing out something that I have read before -cause yes, all administrators are aware of your little rant to PSU on that other wiki- and for the rest I have no intention in getting into an endless back and forth conversation like you did with PSU as there is really nothing that you can say to change the situation.
Fire Eater wrote:
You say I've done wrong but yet none of you have acknowledged that what the Anon has been doing is wrong.
Wrong. It's not because most administrators don't comment, that we don't know what is going on. We know exactly what happened, that is part of the reason why your attempts to get unblocked by posting wall after wall of text has been so widely unsuccessful
Fire Eater wrote:
You guys can't justify punishing only me in this case, because I'm not the only one who did wrong, that Anon's been a jerk a lot lately, I was merely trying to discourage his attitude and his commenting style.
Dude, you say you are 21, start acting like it. So what, another user annoys you: be the bigger man and walk away. If that user comes after you, ignore them further. Again, be the grownup of the two. Besides, do you realize how incredibly hypocritical you are being with your "I was merely trying to discourage his attitude and his commenting style"? Why do you think so many people keep provoking you? Because you are an incredibly easy target. You are totally predictable in your argumentation and you cannot keep your anger in check. As such, it has become a sport for others to see who can provoke you into another one of your (in)famous outbursts. It's a game to them and you fall for it time and time and time again, and then your best defense is "but he started it".
Fire Eater wrote:
It had nothing to do with my hate for the new series, I was trying to get him to stop annoying the wiki with him imposing his views on the rest of us.
When are you finally going to understand that we don't give a rat's ass about your views on Korra? I couldn't care any less about what the entire world thinks about the series, so please, once and for all, understand that we don't give a shit about your views. We don't care about your comments. We don't bother ourselves with what you have to say. Sorry for the harsh words, but I am really trying to make you to understand that the reason why you have to many conflicts on the wiki is not because you don't like TLoK, but it is because you are complete hypocritical about it and have become a broken record that keeps playing the same song over and over again. As I said above: you are a predictable user with anger management issues, which is like a red flag for a bull for more rational users like that anonymous user. Yes, he may often only be out to provoke you, but you fall for it every time again!
Fire Eater wrote:
You guys don't think he did wrong but I'm telling you, he did. He is actively doing it. You guys hate me, that much I can see. But you can't use that as your excuse to punish only me and not him. You don't think he's doing wrong now but trust me, he will if you keep letting him off the hook. Are you sure you guys weren't partially motivated by bias in blocking me again? I get it, you folks hate me and my commenting style.
I mean this in the most polite way as possible, but get over yourself. Do you really think that you are important enough to any of the administrators to invoke feelings of hate toward you? At most, you annoy us with your constant antics. Why? Because we can all see the traps other users set out for you from a mile aways and we see you fall into them time and time again, each time crawling out of that hole yelling and screaming, forcing us to step in. Once again, it all boils down to your own inability to control your temper. The provocation that the other users are doing at your address falls within the policy boundaries. Is it annoying for us to see them do it time and again? Yes, it is, but since they don't breach policy by that, they are allowed to do it under the protection of free speech. You, on the other hand, fall in those traps open eyes each time and start ranting and whatnot, actions that do breach the policy. To put it bluntly: you are the sheep and they are the cattle dogs.
Fire Eater wrote:
But you think I'm stupid enough to evict a user myself when I don't have that authority? I was giving him something to think about in his actions. He is not clear of guilt in this and you folks know it. If you're going to do it to me, do it to him. Maybe we're both guilty, and you can't use your dislike of me to ignore what he's doing. Granted, I'm mostly referring to PSUAvatar14 as he's the one who administered the block, but you're also an admin and I see you think I am the only one guilty here. You folks aren't giving me a chance to explain myself so I'm forced to come to you to tell you what the real story was.
You have gotten plenty of chances before. So really, the main things that you should take away from all this is:
The administrators don't hate you, none of us do. We do, however, get annoyed by your inability to ignore others, keep your anger in check, refrain from being hypocritical, accept other people's opinions, be civil and polite, respect others, etc etc.
Start doing all the things I just listed as being annoyances of the administrators -and other users for that matter as well.
Stop saying that you're the victim of "administrators that hate [you]". It's not true, get over it.
Understand that you are not blocked because you dislike TLoK: face it, we don't give a shit. You are blocked because of your attitude and how you deal with people.
Learn to control your anger, and if you can't, then stop commenting, cause if you can't control that anger on your own, a next block will follow and then it will likely be 6 months. And if you then keep haunting down administrators on other wikis to posts rants like this, you will be reported for harassment to wikia.
So please, learn from all this, learn from all what other users have ever told you to stop and/or start doing, and actually follow their advice if you want to continue to be a part of the Avatar Wiki community, cause your antics are getting really old.
"Cutesy"? Yeah, like starting off with cutesy talk like that is anymore productive than what you accuse me of doing. Just saying.
Then if you know what happened, stop pretending he's clear of guilt. Otherwise, you've just been one-sided on the matter.
22, Lostris. 22. And fine, maybe I can admit to that. Doesn't help anyone that he's there being a jackass either though. You've seen his stalker tactics, maybe you guys should reevaluate the matter. Fine, he's not worth my attention nor is he worth the attention of anyone else on that wiki, but he is a somewhat antagonistic user that I would not be so passive about. And I ain't letting him trip me up again when I do get back.
Hypocritical? Okay, EXPLAIN how that's even true. I want to know how in any sense I've been "hypocritical".
Lostris, you really expect me to believe that after two blocks you "don't give a rat's ass" about what I have to say? Again, you are not considering the actions of the other user, I swear to God you guys aren't.
Okay, FINE. I've given in too much, I am man enough to admit it. But that does not excuse your inaction on the issue, yours, PSUAvatar14's, or the others. He's still being a jackass like maybe I've been, go back to the wiki and see how he's still being a nuisance that nobody's taking too kindly to.
You still don't have me fully convinced, Lostris. No hatred for me whatsoever? It's gonna take me a long time to believe that.
Oh don't worry, when I get back you will see that I will NEVER give you people cause to block me again. When I get back, I will be entirely non-provocative. But if that Anon acts out of order more than he currently is, then you people must act. He's getting more annoying on that wiki, and I would've much rather you folks dealt with him than I did.
Maybe I'll take a few lessons from this, but I still don't think you people are devoid of hate for me. All I know is I will not give you any reason to block me again. I don't intend to ever get blocked again, especially not by anyone on Avatar Wiki. Mark my words, it is the last time I am ever giving you folks a reason to block me, even though I still think you wildly misinterpreted my own actions. But whatever, I intend to prove to you folks when I get back that I can be just as good a user as the others without necessitating some stupid block; I can admit I've done wrong, but seeing how you've let another person who did wrong slide, I am definitely making sure I never attract your attention again. I want to remain on Avatar Wiki because I love ATLA, and when I exit the wiki it will not be because of some block or some user with an ego, it will be on my own accord.
Of course, you folks would see it now if you hadn't blocked me, but whatever, when I get back, I won't be giving you anymore cause for blocks.
I'm not really sure if I missed anything. Lots of spare time are a pain :c I find myself going back here even though I have actually nothing to do. *shakes her head*
XD Oh, a nice tip, if you and the other admins found a spambot, just report here. There's a button for a user and an IP. No need to have them blocked for an infinite time ;)
I do love how your man -insert wink here- responded to the spambot <3
Oh, someone nudged me with the imports.js update, specifically on the user tags side. It should be code.js now and not code.min.js :) You okay with changing it, m'lady?
Oooh, that I didn't understand . . . hehe, oops ^^". Well, not that I don't want to and not that I don't believe you to be right on this, but I tend to not stick my nose in things I know absolutely nothing about -and messing with the js is one of those things :-p However, I shall direct one of the more code-savvy admins to this message, so they can take a look at it instead (which would put me at ease more than when I would do it myself ^^").
You know why, but to humor you once, I'll copy paste the reasons here: "Inserting false information: Initmidating behavior/harassment/ignoring several pleas to stop"
The final drop was that you forged information. At this point, you have lied so much that we could never hope to find out whether or not you actually did, but let's presume that you did, then that's a blockable offense by our policies. If you didn't, then that's also a blockable offense by our policies by the reasons you were warned beforehand for, so either way, you are blocked for a year.
1. I'm not going to unblock you, why would I do that? You did agitate the block, you did breach policy, you were rightfully blocked, and you will remain that way.
2. What does me allegedly not liking TF has to do with anything? Sure, it is no secret that he and I have our differences and have our own views on things, but that is relevant to this . . . how?
Why wont you change the location of the two headed fish? it is not a common ingredient of the water tribe, it is not cooked there, and it can not be found there. It comes from a lake in the fire nation, i know you know this. but because sokka bought one while he was there does not make it common to the water tribe. i'm banned for 3 days but i'm prepared to come back as many times as it takes before you CORRECT this. why would you insist on misleading any new avatar fans?
You could've just reacted on the block message on AW, that ability is normally not blocked.
Anyway, the two-headed fish is listed under the Water Tribe ingredients cause the only known dish known to be made with said fish is made by the Katara, thus the Water Tribe.
You were blocked because your edits were just plain disrespectful to others and full with curse words. Instead of starting a discussion with the people that undid your edit in the first place, you just started an edit war with profane language. If you start that up again in the future, it will just be with the same results, only longer. If you have a problem with something on the pages and someone else undoes your edit, you can take that discussion to their talk pages and try to come to a consensus there as opposed to change the article time and time again.
Since i can finally talk to someone i have calmed down, before i felt i was fighting with a computer before and admit me behavior was inappropiate. I have always agreed with the two headed fish soup dish because it was made by water tribe, but the ingredient is only found in the fire nation. i thought it would be a simple fix without adding confusion why it was a water tribe dish and fire nation ingredient. and before, i had no idea how to use this website and still do not. and i first changed the edit and explained without cursing. the cursing came later when my edit changes were changed back and ignored. i felt that whoever was in charge would not want to see cursing and would change where the two headed fish is common to aviod me coming back, plus it is not like this info i was giving was incorrect. i'm sorry and apoligize to you personally for my behavior, i know it wasnt the way to go. i actually enjoy this website but want it to be correct as possible
i actually think if whoever is in controll of this page doesnt want to move the location of the two head fish because the only dish made with the ingredient is that dish, they could at least put in the desciption of the fish that it is a common ingredient but is only found in fire nation lakes, only because the article makes it appear the two headed fish swims in arctic waters and that the water tribe can catch them at home
No one is in control of that page, it is a community edited wiki, thus everyone can change things on pages. However, one must do so constructively and when an issue with another editor arises, one must converse with them, not start an edit war during which you insult the other party/parties.
Btw, you could've added that in by yourself as opposed to the degrading messages that you inserted. That would've been much more productive than what you did.
i originally deleted the two headed fish from the common water tribe ingredients months ago thinking that this page was constructed by one and afterwards left it as it was free to edits, but after i deleted it and checked the page later that day,it had returned. so i changed it a months or two back to say it was found in the fire nation, and when i returned it was changed back. So i started thinking the editor was being stubborn so i rewrote it with () to say it was a fire nation ingredient and it needed to be changed, hoping that the editor would delted what i put but change it, but what i wrote was deleted with no change. Thats when i was getting mad, because i felt i was fighting with a computer. So out of stupidity, i thought if i curse this guy out i might get some response so i could know there was someone on the other end deleting my edit for kicks. i didnt know there was a message board for this website, i didnt know i could contact admins, i just thought there was some one minded child on the other side just laughing at me and the only way to contact that person was threw the edits i did. do please understand when i was raging like i was, i wasnt directing it toward any one admin, i was sadly fighting with a being i apparently made up, and i do feel stupid about it
Your edits have been undone by four different people and they all have left an edit summary in their undoing edit, explaining why they undid your edit. You, however, ignored all and proceeded to do your own way without any form of conversation.
I can certainly understand why such undoes are irritating, but that does not excuse the behavior you've showcased, nor the language you've used. Not under any circumstances is it acceptable to curse like that on the Avatar Wiki. I really don't care that it wasn't aimed at the administrators, as that doesn't matter. Regardless of whom you targeted, such language has no place on the wiki.
Your block will end tomorrow and you are more than free to restart editing again. However, I suggest that you don't start with removing said piece of information immediately from that cuisine page, but start a conversation with one of the editors that removed you change in the first place. Krazykid51 for example, messaged you four days ago about your edits, requesting more explanation from you as to why you made that edit. You ignored said request and just started doing your own thing again. So I suggest you take him on his request and talk it out with him, so you can also hear the reasoning of others undo your edit. The consensus of said talks is to be respected, even if it still goes against the way you would've wanted to edit it.
If you have time, could you answer this? I'm not really sure when and why answers also cater fanon questions since there is the fanon noticeboard for it ._. Thank you <3
Define being free? I don't have any more classes at the moment, but I am working for school. However, if there is something I am needed for, I can be available :-)
And you're welcome. After all, it's still my duty as well since I'm still an administrator here. Then again, you may always ask my assistance on things ^^.
I was poking around and got directed to this page. But they're allowed now, or at least I think they are since I see them get added... Can you please explain? @_@
You can ignore that. The practice has been for a long time to allow versus questions when both combatants are from the Avatar universe and to answer them with a simple poll.